Jennifer Lopez is struggling to keep individual video footage the lady once got with her first hubby, Ojani Noa, from seeing the light of day. The video — which contains 27 several hours of photos — allegedly includes sexual situations through the pair’s honeymoon vacation back in 97. Noa tried to sell the tape, containing sparked a legal battle with the sultry singer.

But the 41-year-old singer could get a court docket order barring Noa out of releasing the tape, for least for any day. Upon Monday, Seattle State Superior Court Judge James Chalfant dominated in her favor and issued a brief restraining purchase stopping the distribution from the film. Yet , the assess declined to avoid media stores from lift the racy footage in the event they eventually get their hands on it.

Noa’s lawyer, Impotence Meyer, is certainly arguing that his client didn’t violate any privacy agreements with Lopez if he started browsing the job around. States that the video footage is not really a sex recording and says he’s just making a mockumentary about the couple’s tumultuous marriage.

Despite the fact that Noa was unable to discharge the movie, he still desires to do so. He reportedly believes that the tape is safe to produce now that Lopez includes withdrawn her claim against him as the case was in arbitration. As per to In Touch magazine, the master married-dating.org tape belonging to the footage is currently in a central depository but Meyer thinks that they have observed a legal loophole and will be in a position to release it soon.

J Lo’s ex-husband had been caught with his hand in the cookie jar once before, and the « I Can’t Consider It » vocalist isn’t choosing any chances these times. She recently sued Noa meant for $10 million claiming that he breached a privacy agreement if he attempted to sell the home online video video clip from their marriage, which just lasted 13 months.

Noa has filed his own legal action against the hot star, proclaiming that the lady wrongfully dismissed him coming from her Pasadena restaurant in 2006. He also attempted to write a tell-all about their matrimony and was blocked by simply Lopez’s lawyers. In that prior round of litigation, Noa was bought to spend the singer a settlement and arranged not to reveal for money any personal details about their particular relationship.

Jennifer Lopez is struggling to keep individual video footage the lady once got with her first hubby, Ojani Noa, from seeing the light of day. The video — which contains 27 several hours of photos — allegedly includes sexual situations through the pair’s honeymoon vacation back in 97. Noa tried to sell the tape, containing sparked a legal battle with the sultry singer.

But the 41-year-old singer could get a court docket order barring Noa out of releasing the tape, for least for any day. Upon Monday, Seattle State Superior Court Judge James Chalfant dominated in her favor and issued a brief restraining purchase stopping the distribution from the film. Yet , the assess declined to avoid media stores from lift the racy footage in the event they eventually get their hands on it.

Noa’s lawyer, Impotence Meyer, is certainly arguing that his client didn’t violate any privacy agreements with Lopez if he started browsing the job around. States that the video footage is not really a sex recording and says he’s just making a mockumentary about the couple’s tumultuous marriage.

Despite the fact that Noa was unable to discharge the movie, he still desires to do so. He reportedly believes that the tape is safe to produce now that Lopez includes withdrawn her claim against him as the case was in arbitration. As per to In Touch magazine, the master married-dating.org tape belonging to the footage is currently in a central depository but Meyer thinks that they have observed a legal loophole and will be in a position to release it soon.

J Lo’s ex-husband had been caught with his hand in the cookie jar once before, and the « I Can’t Consider It » vocalist isn’t choosing any chances these times. She recently sued Noa meant for $10 million claiming that he breached a privacy agreement if he attempted to sell the home online video video clip from their marriage, which just lasted 13 months.

Noa has filed his own legal action against the hot star, proclaiming that the lady wrongfully dismissed him coming from her Pasadena restaurant in 2006. He also attempted to write a tell-all about their matrimony and was blocked by simply Lopez’s lawyers. In that prior round of litigation, Noa was bought to spend the singer a settlement and arranged not to reveal for money any personal details about their particular relationship.